Following the Notice of EGM announcement made by GO Carriers on 10 April 2006, the Company announces that it has issued a letter to all shareholders today which provides further information ahead of the EGM scheduled for 11.00 a.m. on 19 May in Jersey. The letter also sets out the Board’s response to the Resolutions that are to be considered at the EGM and recommends shareholders to vote against these Resolutions. A copy of the letter is detailed below as well as the formal notice for the EGM. Copies of these documents are available from the EGM 2006 page.
28 April 2006
To all Shareholders of
Global Oceanic Carriers Limited
Dear Shareholder,
Global Oceanic Carriers Limited ("Company”)
I enclose a notice for an Extraordinary General Meeting of the Company (“EGM”) requisitioned by a shareholder, to be held at 11.00 a.m. BST on 19 May 2006 at La Place Hotel, La Route du Coin, St. Brelade, Jersey JE3 8BT. A form of proxy in respect of the EGM is also enclosed. The meeting has been convened at the request of HSBC Global Custody Nominee (UK) Limited and the resolutions to be considered at the EGM propose that the existing Board be replaced with a new Board which will review the business of the Company and propose a strategy for the Company, as detailed in the notice of the EGM.
The purpose of this letter is to set out your Board’s response to these resolutions ("Resolutions”) and to recommend that you vote AGAINST the Resolutions for the reasons set out below.
THIS LETTER IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt about the action you should take regarding this letter, you are recommended immediately to consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other independent financial adviser duly authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
If you have sold or transferred all of your shares in Global Oceanic Carriers Limited, please forward this letter at once, together with the accompanying notice of Extraordinary General Meeting and form of proxy, to the purchaser or transferee or to the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected, for onward transmission to the purchaser or transferee.
Background
The Company floated in May 2005. At that time the Company was committed to purchase four vessels as follows: three Panamax ships (GO Faith, GO Public and the Panormos Trader) and a smaller Handymax vessel (GO Pride). The GO Public was purchased with a time charter of US$34,500 per day and the GO Pride came with a time charter of US$18,000 per day. Both charters have recently expired, but the ships continue to be chartered at favourable market rates compared to other vessels of a similar age and size.
The GO Faith and Panormos Trader were on long term charters at the time their respective acquisitions were negotiated. It had been hoped that the owner of the vessels would secure a continuation of the charters, but charter rates could not be agreed. The GO Faith was delivered without a long term charter in place, and on delivery to the Company, was put on the spot market and has been fully employed, except when in routine maintenance, since it was acquired. However dry bulk charter rates declined substantially last summer and the rates achievable for the GO Faith were lower than had been anticipated by your Board and industry commentators.
In light of the substantial change in the market, the Board delayed the acquisition of the fourth vessel, the Panormos Trader, to see whether the market would recover to a level that would make the acquisition commercially sensible.
As a consequence of the decline in dry bulk charter rates, the value of dry bulk vessels was also being affected substantially. The purchase price of the Panormos Trader had been contracted in January 2005 at US$17.2 million, but at November 2005 your Board, in consultation with its ship valuers, considered its value had declined to around US$9 million.
Consequently, in December 2005, the Directors determined that the purchase of the Panormos Trader at the contracted price was not in the Company’s or the shareholders’ interests. We therefore negotiated the cancellation of the planned purchase. Though the Company was liable for the full amount of the contracted price, the settlement which was negotiated by the Board represented a considerable saving of shareholder value. Inevitably, however, this settlement came at a cost which impacted the Company's interim financial results for the period to 30 September 2005.
The impact upon the Company's interim financial results was very disappointing but we consider that the decision not to proceed with the purchase of the Panormos Trader was the appropriate decision for the Company as dry bulk charter rates and ship values have remained at much lower levels than at the point of flotation.
The decision to terminate the contract for the fourth ship has allowed the Company to improve some of the terms of the initial acquisition finance loan from Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG. Until the Panormos Trader acquisition contract was terminated, the Company was required to drawdown all of the acquisition loan facility for the acquisition of four vessels, obliging the Company to service the corresponding debt, including significant capital repayments, from an income generated by only three vessels. This was a significant burden for the Company. However, the Company has repaid the bank approximately US$9.6 million of capital in eight months, which represents approximately 34% of the core debt for three vessels. The repayment schedule has been renegotiated by your Board and is now more appropriate for the income generated by three, as opposed to four, vessels.
From late September until December 2005, the Directors explored with the Company’s brokers, Collins Stewart Limited, the prospects for a further fund raising to replace the bank debt and provide the necessary capital to purchase additional vessels on more favourable terms. We regarded the purchase of additional vessels, on the right terms, as a key component in the development of the business to create the necessary economies of scale.
Due to an apparent lack of investor appetite, we did not secure sufficient support for that fundraising on appropriate terms to enable us to proceed with that plan. Consequently, in early 2006, your Directors undertook a review of the strategic options available to the Company with a view to seeking how best to secure shareholder value going forward.
Since then a number of different proposals in connection with the development of the Company have been generated. Inevitably conditions of confidentiality apply to such proposals. However, the proposals include:
In principle the Directors favour defined approaches of this nature as they demonstrate a willingness to inject cash or assets and/or crystallise shareholder value. The Directors note the possibility that these proposals may not lead to a binding contract, however your Directors are encouraged by the level of interest shown.
It is worth highlighting that the continuance of the existing Board is not a pre-condition to any of the current proposals.
On 7 April 2006, Globus Shipping Inc (“Globus”) announced its initiative in light of the EGM requisitioned by HSBC Global Custody Nominee (UK) Limited to replace the existing Board. Globus stated it would use independent third parties to value the Company’s fleet and, within six weeks of the new Board’s appointment, would revert to shareholders, enabling them to vote freely on the alternatives of:
Initially, Globus indicated to the Board that it wished to inject a fleet of vessels into the Company, and indicated that it would require a significant majority of the enlarged share capital by way of consideration. The Board understands that Globus sold this fleet and, following this sale, Globus has amended its proposal to that set out in the notice of the EGM. However, the Board notes that Globus, in its various approaches to the Company, has not committed to any proposal that recognises or crystallises a value for the existing shareholders, had insisted that any fees it incurred be underwritten by the Company and had demanded exclusivity prior to commencing detailed discussions.
The Board believes the Globus approach to be less welcome since it is less well defined in comparison with other proposals and it does not commit Globus to a particular course of action.
Current Position
The Board believes that the Company's fleet has traded profitably since flotation. Other than in respect of the cost of the negotiated settlement in connection with the Panormos Trader acquisition, the Company operated profitably to the period ended 30 September 2005.
Apart from scheduled maintenance periods, the three vessels have been chartered throughout the period. The Company has repaid approximately US$9.6 million of debt since flotation. The Board remains convinced that the acquisition, on the right terms, of further vessels is essential.
Your Board wishes to see shareholders presented with proposals which best suit shareholders’ expectations in light of current circumstances. The Directors further believe that, as the process to achieve such a position is already well developed, it would not be in shareholders’ interests to interrupt or delay this process by replacing the existing Board at this juncture.
The Directors have appointed Brewin Dolphin Securities Limited ("Brewin Dolphin") to assist the Board in the process of assessing the various proposals and to advise them in relation to the recommendation to be made in due course to shareholders.
The Directors anticipate that such a recommendation will be made by early June 2006.
Summary
In summary:
The Board believes that the approach from Globus is not sufficiently developed and the Resolutions to replace the current Board are unhelpful to shareholders as it may deprive them of the opportunity of a proper assessment of the proposals currently being considered by the Board and any other proposals that may be received.
Action to be taken
You will find enclosed with this letter the notice of the EGM together with a form of proxy. All shareholders are requested to complete and return a copy of the form of proxy to Riviera Nominees Limited, the Company Secretary, at 6 Britannia Place, Bath Street, St Helier, Jersey JE2 4SU, so as to be received as soon as possible and, in any event, by no later than 11.00 a.m. on 17 May 2006. If you complete and return the form of proxy, you will not be prevented from attending and voting in person at the EGM if you so wish.
Recommendation
The Board recommends that you vote AGAINST the resolutions proposed at the EGM on 19 May 2006 (as each of the members of your existing Board intends to do in respect of its beneficial holdings of shares in the Company).
Yours sincerely,
Konstantinos Dimitriou
Chairman
Global Oceanic Carriers Limited
Notice of Extraordinary General Meeting
Notice is given that an extraordinary general meeting of the Company (“EGM”) will be held at La Place Hotel, La Route du Coin, St. Brelade, Jersey JE3 8BT, Channel Islands on 19 May 2006 at 11.00 a.m. BST for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, adopting the following Ordinary Resolutions at the meeting, or any adjournment thereof:
Dated: 28 April 2006
Registered Office Address: 6 Brittania Place, Bath Street, St. Helier, Jersey JE2 4SU, Channel Islands
NOTES:
For further information:
| Global Oceanic Carriers Limited | |
| Vassilis Vintiadis, Chief Executive Officer | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7398 7700 |
| vassilis@gocarriers.com | Media enquiries: |
| Abchurch | |
| Henry Harrison-Topham / Charlie Jack | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7398 7700 |
| henry.ht@abchurch-group.com | www.abchurch-group.com |
Notes to editors
Global Oceanic Carriers Limited, is a newly formed shipping company comprising of ship ownership, management and chartering. The company is based in Piraeus, Greece and incorporated in Jersey. The Company has acquired three vessels and will use the extensive shipping experience of the management and the dynamic market conditions to build a fleet for long term charter revenue.
The Company’s fleet comprises of two Panamax bulk carriers and one Handysize vessel with an aggregate carrying capacity of 171,941 Dwt. The Company has brought together the considerable shipping expertise and contacts of the Board, in particular the CEO, Vassilis Vintiadis, the founder and owner of Niva Shipping Limited a 27 year old shipping company based in Piraeus, Greece with strategic relationships primarily focused on China and India.
GO Carriers is listed on the AIM market, stock code GOC.L